Pages

Robin Hood


What do you remember most about your last vacation? You remember the places you went, the things you saw and most likely where you went to eat. If I were to ask you though, did that really make your vacation awesome or was it something else? I’ve taken a lot of long trips in my life and I remember most of them fondly. For some reason though as I look back on it, it seems like the destination becomes less and less important. 

I went to Panama City Beach, FL three times out of my four and half year college experience. PCB was the place we went but it became just a backdrop for the memories I made there. A good vacation is not just a series of events. You don’t just move from point A to point B. You fill in the gaps with the experiences you had. In turn those experiences become the foundation for your memories and that’s what you remember. It’s funny but this theory also works in film and story too.

Robin Hood could be looked at as a film about travel. During the story our main character played by the every man Russell Crowe covers a lot of ground. As always, Crowe brings his unique style of rugged but gentle character traits to the screen. He moves throughout the plot and delivers a good performance. The same can be said for Ridley Scott. I can’t begin to express how much admiration I have for this director. He’s in my top five and I’ve always loved his work. His command of the camera and his visual story telling are second to none. He is just as present in this film/trip as Crowe. So why was I so bored?

To put it simply, this film was all about the destinations. I’m not taking about the sets or locations they filmed in. Go back and think about your last vacation again? Imagine you don’t have any of the filler that become the memories you made and just have the locations you visited. Suddenly your experience becomes just plain flat. That’s exactly what happened in this new big screen version of Robin Hood. It moved to its plot points and the film kept going but I never really cared about these characters. They moved throughout the story and never really gave me anything to remember. To drive my point home lets look at a true Ridley Scott masterpiece. 

I'll never forget the opening scene of Gladiator. We see Maximus standing on the edge of a battle field. He is strong and impressive and even intimidating in his armor. Do you remember what happens next. He looks up at tiny bird that flutters away and smiles. In that moment the audience is shown who this character is and what gives him motivation. He was a great warrior but it wasn't his true place. He accepted his current position but he longed for something else. It's those moments that make a film memorable and they weren't found anywhere in Robin Hood. 

Normally this is where I’d tell you to go and see the film for yourself but I’ve got to be honest here. I’ve looked back at all the films I’ve reviewed over the last year or so and they always entertained me. That's why I tell you to go see them. Not so with this one though. Its just not entertaining and you should save your money and rent it later on.
 
Until next time I’ll be listening to Everything I do, I do for you on my iPod. 

The Pretentious Filmmaker
Read more

MacGruber


Over the last five years three acts have dominated modern comedy. This first consists of Jon Stewart and his writing team. Whether you agree with his politics or not his show is freaking hysterical. The second is Todd Philips and his merry band of idiots. That name doesn’t ring a bell for you? Well I’m sure The Hangover does and Philips was responsible for it. Find a comedy that was more loved or embraced as strongly by film critics the world over, you won’t. The third act is none other then Akiva Schaffer, Jorma Taccone and Andy Samberg. Collectively known as the Lonely Island. Even if you don’t know them you’ve seen their stuff every time a digital short was on SNL. They created the $^#(@ in the box guys, laser cats and of course Macgruber which is now a feature length film. So was it any good? 

Imagine the last time you went to the bathroom in a gas station along a highway somewhere. What did you see written in the stalls? I’m guessing you probably can’t repeat most of it. Some of it might have been funny but the majority probably catered to the lowest common denominator. This is the best way I can sum up Macgruber. This film was way to foul even for me and mind you I ingest a healthy dose of Family Guy and South Park weekly.

You might be thinking that The Hangover wasn’t all that family friendly either. You’re right but the difference between these two films is vast. In The Hangover there were moments where the story went to the gutter but the film wasn’t dominated by that type of humor. It was smart, it was oddball and at times so funny I almost had to run to the little boy’s room. Macgruber was the exact opposite. It lived in the gutter and every once in awhile it climbed out and gave us solid comedy. That’s what made me so angry. The boys at the Lonely Island are immensely talented and those few moments of good comedy in Macgruber prove it. So why does every joke in this film have to be based on a penis or a vagina? These guys are better then that. Why were they so lazy in their writing? 

The Lonely Island didn’t give us a film to laugh the night away. They gave us a look into most junior and senior high boy’s mind across the country. I tried to have fun, tried to will myself to laugh but instead I felt like I was using a shovel to dig through crap. At the end of the night I didn’t find enough comedy gold to make that terrible smell worth it. 

Until next time I’ll be trying to answer the ultimate comedy question. Why did that darn chicken cross that road anyways?

The Pretentious Filmmaker
Read more
 

The Pretentious Filmmaker Design by Insight © 2009